Are Perceptions of Organizational Justice Universal? An Exploration of Measurement Invariance Across Thirteen Cultures

Fischer R., Ferreira M. C., Jiang D., Cheng B., Achoui M. M., Wong C. C., ...Daha Fazla

SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, cilt.24, sa.4, ss.297-313, 2011 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 24 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2011
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s11211-011-0142-7
  • Dergi Adı: SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.297-313
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Organizational justice, Power distance, Collectivism, Equivalence, Invariance, Multi-group factor analysis, OF-FIT INDEXES, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, BEHAVIOR, VALUES, ALLOCATION, CRITERIA, OUTCOMES, MODEL
  • Anadolu Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Previous research examined whether justice effects are comparable, focusing on quantitative differences in justice effects. This study examines whether justice perceptions are structured similarly or whether they are qualitatively different across working populations from 13 nations. Confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group analysis show that Colquitt's (J Appl Psychol 86:386-400, 2001) four-dimensional model of justice works well across these samples. However, factor intercorrelations and reliabilities are found to systematically vary between cultural samples. Perceptions of justice are more highly intercorrelated in power distant and collectivistic samples, in line with extensions of the relational model of authority. Score reliabilities were lower in collectivistic settings.