The Evaluation of "Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge based Argumentation Practices" Training for Science Teachers

Creative Commons License

ÜNAL ÇOBAN G., AKPINAR E., BARAN B., Saglam M. K., ÖZCAN E., KAHYAOĞLU ERDOĞMUŞ Y.

EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, cilt.41, sa.188, ss.1-33, 2016 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 41 Sayı: 188
  • Basım Tarihi: 2016
  • Doi Numarası: 10.15390/eb.2016.6615
  • Dergi Adı: EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-33
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Technological pedagogical content knowledge, Argumentation, Professional development, Science teachers, SELF-EFFICACY, INQUIRY, TPACK, FRAMEWORK, ISSUES
  • Anadolu Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

In science education, creating learning environments supported with technology and students' use of theory-evidence coordination when expressing their ideas is emphasized regarding the development of students' scientific reasoning, critical thinking, decision making skills, and etc. In this process, great responsibilities are fallen to teachers as planner and designer of a learning environment. In this study, it is aimed to assess the training which aims the development of science teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through argumentation practices. In this context; this study evaluated the science teachers' argumentation skills, self-efficacy perceptions towards TPACK and the teachers' views about the training. 37 science teachers working at different cities in Turkey participated in the one group pre-test post-test experimental training study, which was lasted 54 hours during a week. The training is composed of both hand and minds on argumentation practices based on TPACK. The participants joined different activities such as collaborative group works, drama, modeling, thematic games, art activities, problem-based learning, field trips, observation and workshops. In the study, Argumentation Test, TPACK Self Efficacy Belief Scale were used as data collection tools. At the end of the training written views of science teachers towards activities were taken. In the light of the findings, this training was effective on the participants' self-efficacy levels towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Moreover, this training resulted in a positive change in the participants' views about how a statement could be accepted as an argument. However, the increase in scores of argumentation skills was not significant. Additionally almost all of the participants stated that they found the activities useful and can use in their classes. By considering these results, some suggestions were given.